10 Workers Rights Other Countries Guarantee

American Oligarch Larry Ellison. Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Picture a German worker learning they have only 10 sick days per year. Not 10 days at reduced pay, but 10 days total. After that, they lose income or their job. The German would assume you're describing dystopian fiction. Yet this is reality for most American workers.

To see why this matters, consider what employment actually is. In the United States, we've accepted a specific belief: employment is a voluntary contract between equals where each party can walk away at any time. But examine this belief closely. The worker who loses their job loses healthcare, income, and often their home. The employer loses one employee among many. If this is equality, then so is a fight between someone with a gun and someone without one.

Other developed nations start from a different premise: employment creates an inherent power imbalance requiring legal correction. The rights that flow from this recognition reveal just how far America has drifted from the developed world's consensus on human dignity at work.

Take Sweden, where parents receive 480 days of paid parental leave. Not weeks. 480 days. Each parent gets 240 days, with 90 non-transferable, paid at 80% of salary. Parents can use these days until the child turns twelve. Sweden treats child-rearing as societal investment rather than private burden. The economics are straightforward: healthy, well-attached children contribute to society for 80 years. Sixteen months of parental care pays dividends for generations.

The United States stands alone among developed nations without federally mandated paid leave. We treat reproduction as personal indulgence with personal costs. But if society has no stake in its next generation, why should that generation have any stake in society?

While American parents scramble back to work days after giving birth, German workers enjoy another reality-defying benefit: unlimited sick leave. They take as many sick days as medically necessary. Employers pay 100% for six weeks, then insurance covers 70% for up to 78 weeks. No caps. No accumulation. No questions beyond a doctor's note.

Germany recognizes that illness strikes randomly and recovery takes time. Forcing sick workers to choose between health and income creates worse outcomes: workplace infections spread, mistakes multiply, recovery periods extend. The Germans built their system around human biology rather than demanding biology conform to quarterly earnings reports. American workers? 19% receive zero paid sick days. Those lucky enough to have coverage typically get 5-10 days annually, as if viruses respect corporate policy.

Beyond sick leave, the human need for rest extends to regular recuperation. Austria mandates 25-30 vacation days plus 13 public holidays. Some workers enjoy 43 paid days off annually. This isn't generosity; it's performance optimization. Cognitive science demonstrates that extended work periods degrade decision-making, increase errors, and destroy creativity. You wouldn't run machinery continuously without maintenance. Human brains, infinitely more complex than any machine, require more downtime, not less.

The US alone among wealthy nations mandates zero vacation days. A quarter of American workers receive no paid vacation at all. Those who do typically get 10-15 days after years of service, treating rest as reward rather than requirement.

Even when European workers leave the office, they actually leave. France requires companies to negotiate policies limiting after-hours contact. Firms that fail to establish these agreements face penalties. The principle is elementary: work performed outside office hours demands compensation. Answering emails at 9 PM is work. Taking calls on Sunday is work. Being perpetually on-call is work. France prices this accurately. Employers wanting round-the-clock availability must pay round-the-clock wages.

Americans have normalized unpaid overtime through euphemism. "Flexibility" means working whenever demanded. "Dedication" means sacrificing evenings and weekends without compensation. Digital technology has eliminated the boundary between work and life, and employers pocket the difference.

The power imbalance extends beyond daily work into job security itself. Dutch workers earn severance from day one: one-third monthly salary per year worked. Probationary periods don't exempt employers. Dismissal always costs something. Why? Because termination risk falls unequally. Employers maintain multiple revenue streams, credit lines, and cash reserves. Workers depend on single incomes. Severance payments acknowledge this asymmetry rather than pretending it doesn't exist.

American at-will employment treats firing and quitting as equivalent acts. But losing your only income source differs fundamentally from losing one employee among dozens. One threatens survival; the other threatens margins.

Perhaps most remarkably, German workers don't just collect paychecks—they help run companies. Workers hold up to half of German corporate board seats. Companies with 2,000+ employees require near-parity representation. Even five-person firms must establish worker councils with veto powers over key decisions.

Americans champion democracy everywhere except where they spend most of their waking hours. We vote for presidents but not for CEOs. We demand representation in government while accepting autocracy at work. Germans recognized that democracy shouldn't end at the office door. German manufacturing dominates global markets despite (or because of) worker representation. Turns out those doing the work possess insights about improving it.

Looking toward the future, Australian employers contribute 12% of wages to retirement accounts, separate from salary. Not optional matching, not voluntary contributions. Mandatory. The system now manages $4.2 trillion Australian. Behavioral economics shows humans systematically undervalue distant rewards. We're neurologically wired for present bias. Australia designed around this limitation rather than moralizing about it.

America's 401(k) system demands workers repeatedly choose future security over present consumption. It's like designing highways assuming drivers will voluntarily maintain safe following distances. Predictably, nearly 30% of working-age Americans have saved nothing for retirement.

The French take this principle of employer responsibility even further into daily life. French law mandates 50% employer reimbursement of commuting costs. Metro passes, train tickets, even bicycle rentals. Universal coverage, no exceptions. The logic cuts straight: commuting generates employer profit. Workers traveling to offices create value for companies, not themselves. France assigns costs to those reaping benefits.

American workers average $5,000 annually on commuting, a mandatory expense yielding zero personal return. Companies requiring specific uniforms provide them. Those needing special tools supply them. Yet transportation, equally essential, somehow became the worker's problem.

Portuguese workers receive 14 months' salary for 12 months' work. December brings Christmas bonuses. Summer includes vacation pay. Legal requirements, not employer largesse. Annual expenses spike predictably. Holidays cost more. Vacations require lump sums. Portugal synchronizes income with spending patterns rather than forcing workers into debt cycles.

Americans face the same expense spikes without income adjustment. Credit cards bridge the gap. Interest compounds. Debt becomes structural, not situational.

Finally, France and Austria cover 90%+ of workers through industry-wide agreements binding all employers, union or not. Entire sectors negotiate together. Individual workers cannot negotiate fairly when refusal means destitution. Individual employers cannot raise standards when competitors undercut them. Sectoral bargaining breaks this deadlock by moving the entire industry simultaneously.

America's enterprise-level bargaining creates a race to the bottom. Each worker accepts less to avoid unemployment. Each employer cuts costs to match competition. Only 10% of American workers enjoy union protection, leaving 90% to negotiate alone against organizations with legal departments.

These rights share a common recognition: employment isn't a contract between equals. When one party needs the relationship to survive and the other views it as one option among many, power tilts inevitably toward the latter.

Germany, France, Sweden, and Australia maintain competitive economies while guaranteeing these protections. Their systems align with human reality: people get sick unpredictably, need rest to function, reproduce, age, and cannot negotiate fairly under threat of poverty.

America alone among developed nations denies these basic facts. We've built elaborate theories about why the world's wealthiest country cannot provide what others consider bare minimums. Yet claiming Americans need less rest, security, and voice than other humans requires believing we're either superhuman or subhuman.

We're neither. The gap between American and international standards reflects neither natural law nor economic necessity, but political choice. These rights exist wherever workers demanded them forcefully enough.

Fight for your rights. Organize your labor. Don't wait for permission to do either.

If you enjoyed this article, you might also like:

CONSERVATISM: AMERICA’S EMPATHY DISORDER
My latest book
Get it on Amazon →

Works Cited

Australian Taxation Office. "How Much Super to Pay." Australian Government, 2025, www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/super-for-employers/paying-super-contributions/how-much-super-to-pay.

Austrian Federal Economic Chamber. "Collective Agreements in Austria." Entsendeplattform, 2024, www.entsendeplattform.at/en/collective-agreements/principles.

Austrian Federal Ministry of Labor. "Paid Leave and Leave." Sozialministerium, 2024, www.sozialministerium.gv.at/en/Topics/Labour/Labour-Law/Paid-Leave-and-Leave.html.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Paid Sick Leave: What Is Available to Workers?" U.S. Department of Labor, March 2024, www.bls.gov/ebs/factsheets/paid-sick-leave.htm.

---. "Union Members Summary - 2024." U.S. Department of Labor, January 2025, www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm.

Business.gov.nl. "Transition Payment After Dismissal." Government of the Netherlands, 2025, business.gov.nl/staff/dismissing-staff/transition-payment-after-dismissal/.

CMS Legal. "Dismissals and Termination of Employment in the Netherlands." CMS Law, 2024, cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-dismissals/netherlands.

Department of Labor. "Family and Medical Leave Act." U.S. Department of Labor, 2024, www.dol.gov/general/topic/benefits-leave/fmla.

---. "Vacation Leave." U.S. Department of Labor, 2024, www.dol.gov/general/topic/workhours/vacation_leave.

DGB German Trade Union Confederation. "German Codetermination." DGB, 2024, en.dgb.de/fields-of-work/german-codetermination.

Eurofound. "Collective Bargaining Coverage." European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2024, www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/european-industrial-relations-dictionary/collective-bargaining-coverage.

Federal Reserve Board. "Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2019 - Retirement." Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 2020, www.federalreserve.gov/publications/2020-economic-well-being-of-us-households-in-2019-retirement.htm.

Försäkringskassan. "Parental Benefit." Swedish Social Insurance Agency, 2025, www.forsakringskassan.se/english/parents/when-the-child-is-born/parental-benefit.

INRS. "Droit à la déconnexion: Comment le mettre en œuvre dans l'entreprise?" Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, 2024, www.inrs.fr/publications/juridique/focus-juridiques/focus-droit-deconnexion.html.

Légifrance. "Code du travail: Prise en charge des frais de transports publics." Government of France, 2024, www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGISCTA000020080275.

Migration.gv.at. "Leave (Annual Leave, Parental Leave etc.)." Austrian Government, 2024, www.migration.gv.at/en/living-and-working-in-austria/working/leave-annual-leave-parental-leave-etc/.

Ministère du Travail. "La prise en charge des frais de transport par l'employeur." French Ministry of Labor, 2024, travail-emploi.gouv.fr/la-prise-en-charge-des-frais-de-transport-par-lemployeur.

Mitbestimmungsgesetz. "Codetermination Act of 1976." Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 2024, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitbestimmungsgesetz.

Nordic Cooperation. "Parental Benefit in Sweden." Nordic Council of Ministers, 2025, www.norden.org/en/info-norden/parental-benefit-sweden.

Papaya Global. "Portugal: Mandatory Benefits, Payroll & Taxes Info." Papaya Global, 2025, www.papayaglobal.com/countrypedia/country/portugal/.

Remofirst. "Labor Laws in Portugal: Complete Guide." Remofirst, 2024, www.remofirst.com/post/guide-to-labor-laws-in-portugal.

Rippling. "10 Things You Need to Know About Portuguese Employment and Labor Laws." Rippling, 2024, www.rippling.com/blog/labor-employment-law-in-portugal.

Verdi. "German Labour Law Basics: Paid Sick Leave and Accidents." Verdi Trade Union, 2024, tech.verdi.de/labour-law-basics/paid-sick-leave/.

Wikipedia. "Parental Leave in the United States." Wikimedia Foundation, 2024, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave_in_the_United_States.

---. "Superannuation in Australia." Wikimedia Foundation, 2025, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superannuation_in_Australia.