Republicans Will Try to Steal 2026. Here's the Law That Puts Them in Prison.
One-third of Congress denied the 2020 election. Nearly all of them still hold office. In 2026, they might need to accept results that cost them power, but history says they likely won’t.
One hundred fifty-six election deniers hold congressional seats (States United Action, 2024a). The Republican National Committee has deployed over 100,000 “election integrity” volunteers and attorneys across battleground states (Republican National Committee, 2024). Donald Trump controls the pardon power. Meanwhile, Republicans have gerrymandered the system so thoroughly that Democrats could win the popular vote by five points and still lose the House.
Factually, even if Democrats overcome that rigged system and flip the House anyway, the margins will be razor-thin. Three to five seats. Maybe less. Close enough to contest. Close enough to claim fraud. And this time, unlike 2020, Republicans have the institutional power to act on it.
Eighty-four fake electors signed fraudulent certificates in 2020 claiming Trump won seven states he lost. County officials refused to certify results in seventeen cases that year. By 2022, that number had jumped to twenty-two, a thirty percent increase in just one election cycle. Of 291 Republican candidates who denied or questioned 2020 results, 170 won their races in 2022. By 2024, the consolidation was complete. Thirty-one percent of the House. Twenty percent of the Senate. Twenty-three statewide officials with election oversight authority.
Then Trump won, with the help of voter disenfranchisement and gerrymandering. Republican confidence in election accuracy jumped. Harris conceded immediately. No Democratic denial, no calls for investigation, no claims of fraud. But Trump used his victory to expand control, issuing executive orders threatening to eliminate mail-in ballots and “bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections.” Federal courts blocked the orders as unconstitutional, so if you have faith in Republicans willingness to abide by court orders, rather than gain power at all costs, then feel free to stop reading and trust that everything will be fine.
For those still reading, you know that Republicans will accept results they win, contest results they lose, and have few checks on their the power to do so.
Federal law carries serious penalties for election subversion. Conspiracy against voting rights allows up to ten years imprisonment, the statute cited in Trump’s federal indictment. Obstructing official proceedings provides twenty years, charged in over 350 January 6 prosecutions. Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio received twenty-two years for seditious conspiracy. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes got eighteen.
Then Trump granted clemency to nearly all January 6 defendants. On his first day in office, he issued full pardons to approximately 1,500 people and commuted sentences for 14 extremist group leaders, including Rhodes and Tarrio, whose seditious conspiracy convictions remain but who walk free (Trump, 2025; U.S. Department of Justice, 2025). The federal deterrent evaporated overnight.
State prosecutions reveal an even deeper problem. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel charged all sixteen of the state’s fake electors with forgery and election law violations carrying maximum sentences of fourteen years. In September 2025, a judge dismissed everything. The reasoning was precise. “This is a fraud case, and we have to prove intent, and I don’t believe there’s evidence sufficient to prove intent.” One cooperating witness testified that defendants believed they were acting legally by creating an “alternate” slate.
The Michigan dismissal establishes a blueprint for 2026. Claim good-faith belief in election fraud and thereby give activist sedition friendly judges the cover they need to make criminal intent impossible to prove.
Georgia’s RICO case against Trump and eighteen others is functionally dead after the DA’s permanent disqualification. Only Arizona’s prosecution of eleven fake electors plus seven Trump aides is moving toward trial in January 2026, and defendants will deploy the same “we believed it” defense that succeeded in Michigan.
Of eighty-four fake electors across seven states, only one has been convicted as of October 2025. She received probation with no jail time. A conviction rate of 1.2 percent for participating in a scheme to overturn a presidential election.
Criminal statutes exist. Prosecutors can file charges. Judges accept “good faith belief” as an insurmountable defense. Or Trump pardons anyone who gets caught.
But four states have enacted a different category of law since 2020. Statutes so specific in defining prohibited conduct that the good-faith defense fails. These laws don’t rely on proving subjective intent. They establish objective violations with mandatory penalties.
Four states have statutes that work. Colorado criminalizes fake electors specifically. Up to twenty years in prison for knowingly signing false electoral certificates, with each certificate a separate offense. Arizona criminalizes certification refusal. One to five years for willful refusal to perform mandatory duties, plus expedited court orders compelling compliance and daily fines until officials act. Colorado, Minnesota, and New York protect election workers with criminal penalties up to five years for threatening or doxxing officials, privacy protections for personal information, and required security resources.
These laws define exact prohibited conduct. No proving “intent,” no good-faith defense. You did this, and then you go to prison.
The critical swing states remain dangerously exposed. Pennsylvania, with nineteen electoral votes, has no fake elector statute and no specific criminal penalties for certification refusal. House Bill 2473 would fix both problems, aligning state law with Electoral Count Reform Act deadlines and establishing strict timelines for resolving challenges. It passed the House 105-97 with three Republican co-sponsors. It sits stalled in the Republican Senate.
Wisconsin charged only three Trump operatives who facilitated the fake elector scheme with felonies. The ten fake electors themselves faced no criminal charges, only civil liability requiring them to acknowledge Biden’s victory. Wisconsin still doesn’t allow processing mail ballots before Election Day, creating delay vulnerabilities that fuel conspiracy theories.
Georgia prosecutes 2020’s fake electors while simultaneously enacting laws that increase future subversion risk. The legislature gave itself power to control the State Election Board and allow board takeover of local election administration. The State Election Board issued rules in 2024 giving counties authority to refuse certification, directly contradicting the principle that certification is mandatory. North Carolina restructured election boards to give the legislature full appointment power with no tiebreaker for disputes, replacing up to 408 election officials.
The Brennan Center puts it directly. “Several of the states that Trump specifically targeted in 2020 remain vulnerable to election subversion.”
And the math for 2026 creates perfect storm conditions. Trump’s approval rating sits at 45.3 percent, net negative by seven to ten points (RealClearPolling, 2025). Every president with those numbers has lost Congress in the midterms. Every single one.
But Republicans have gerrymandered themselves with a six-to-seven-seat structural advantage. They’ve passed voter suppression laws in twenty-eight states since 2020. Democrats need to flip only three seats. Eighteen seats are rated toss-ups. Eleven House seats in 2024 were decided by under two percent (Ballotpedia, 2025; Ellis, 2025).
Historical patterns say Republicans should lose. Structural advantages say they might not. If Democrats win anyway, the margins will be close enough to contest.
And there’s a final mechanism that makes 2026 uniquely dangerous. The Electoral Count Reform Act closed loopholes Trump exploited for presidential elections. But it doesn’t cover congressional races. Speaker Mike Johnson can refuse to seat Democrats in close House races under the Federal Contested Elections Act, and courts ruled in 1986 they have no power to review those decisions (Morgan v. United States, 1986). If Johnson refuses to seat three Democrats claiming fraud, Republicans keep control regardless of results.
Prepare for them to try, because being unprepared is an unacceptable outcome when the stakes are this high. Eighty-four fake electors signed false certificates and one received probation. County officials refused certification twenty-two times in 2022 and one pled guilty to a misdemeanor. Trump pardoned every January 6 defendant. The lesson learned was clear. You can get away with it.
But there’s a pathway to accountability running through state legislatures meeting right now. Pennsylvania’s HB 2473 sits in the Senate. Wisconsin considers certification protection bills. Georgia faces lawsuits over State Election Board rules.
The three laws that work exist in model form. Fake elector criminalization, mandatory certification with criminal penalties, and election worker protection. The Brennan Center and Protect Democracy have drafted precise statutory language in their Election Certification Processes and Guardrails guides (All Voting is Local et al., 2024). Four states have proven the framework functions. Most swing states lack critical elements.
Fight back with three phone calls this week to your state representative, state senator, and attorney general asking about specific pending bills and criminal accountability for election subversion. The Voting Rights Lab maintains a live tracker of every election bill at votingrightslab.org. Find your state’s pending legislation. Reference the exact bill number. Ask whether your representative will support criminal penalties for fake electors and certification refusal before 2026.
Another option, become a poll worker. County election offices face desperate shortages forcing consolidation of polling places, creating longer lines that discourage voting. Some counties pay $100 to $300 per day plus training. No experience required. When engaged citizens staff polling places instead of partisan appointees, subversion becomes operationally more difficult.
The Brennan Center produces state-specific analysis identifying exactly which protections each state lacks. Protect Democracy provides legal support for election officials facing pressure. States United Democracy Center works directly with state attorneys general and secretaries of state. The Voting Rights Lab tracks every bill in real time.
State legislatures are considering 2026 election bills right now. The window closes in months, not years. Every constituent call creates political pressure. Every letter to the editor shifts public opinion. Every poll worker makes subversion harder.
If you really want to play hardball then call your elected representatives high dollar donors via publicly accessible data, then ask them why they fund someone who refuses to protect election integrity.
Republicans have built the infrastructure of theft right in front of our eyes. The law that could stop them exists. Four states have these laws and most swing states don’t. The difference between 2026 ending in certification or crisis depends on whether citizens force their states to enact protections that carry actual consequences.
What’s missing is you making three phone calls.
Reminder of what to ask for when you call your AG, State Senator, and State House Representative.
“Four states have statutes that work. Colorado criminalizes fake electors specifically. Up to twenty years in prison for knowingly signing false electoral certificates, with each certificate a separate offense. Arizona criminalizes certification refusal. One to five years for willful refusal to perform mandatory duties, plus expedited court orders compelling compliance and daily fines until officials act. Colorado, Minnesota, and New York protect election workers with criminal penalties up to five years for threatening or doxxing officials, privacy protections for personal information, and required security resources.”
If you found this article worthwhile, check out my book
Conservatism: America’s Empathy Disorder
https://a.co/d/6d4b1uH
References
Ballotpedia. (2025). Election results, 2024: Congressional margin of victory analysis. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2024:_Congressional_margin_of_victory_analysis
Ellis, J. (2025, February 5). The closest House races (Part I). The Ellis Insight. https://www.ellisinsight.com/house/the-closest-house-races-part-i/
Morgan v. United States, 801 F.2d 445 (D.C. Cir. 1986). https://openjurist.org/801/f2d/445
RealClearPolling. (2025). President Trump job approval. https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating
Republican National Committee. (2024, April 19). Trump Campaign and RNC unveil historic 100,000 person strong election integrity program [Press release]. https://gop.com/press-release/trump-campaign-and-rnc-unveil-historic-100000-person-strong-election-integrity-program/
States United Action. (2024a). Election denial in U.S. Congress. ElectionDeniers.org. https://electiondeniers.org/congressional
States United Action. (2024b, December 11). States United Action releases post-election analysis and 2025 election denier landscape: Election deniers have fewer seats, more power in 2025. States United Democracy Center. https://statesunited.org/post-election-2024/
Trump, D. J. (2025, January 20). Granting pardons and commutation of sentences for certain offenses relating to the events at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021 [Presidential proclamation]. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/granting-pardons-and-commutation-of-sentences-for-certain-offenses-relating-to-the-events-at-or-near-the-united-states-capitol-on-january-6-2021/
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Pardon Attorney. (2025, January 20). President Trump’s proclamation granting pardons and commutations of sentences for certain offenses relating to the events at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. https://www.justice.gov/pardon/president-trumps-proclamation-granting-pardons-and-commutations-sentences-certain-offenses




Speaker Johnson has yet to swear in newly elected Arizona lawmaker Adelita Grijalva. What are "we" doing to correct this manipulation in the short and long term? How is it that while I was working hard every day for 70 years and raising a law-abiding family and living the American dream we got to the point where every politician asking me for money so "we" can defeat the "other" people? Laws did not keep up with the structure needed to guarantee fair outcomes. The last Constitutional amendment was??? A raise for Congress. The US government might be shut down but Congress is still getting paid. Vote the bums out.
“Speaker Mike Johnson can refuse to seat Democrats in close House races under the Federal Contested Elections Act, and courts ruled in 1986 they have no power to review those decisions (Morgan v. United States, 1986). If Johnson refuses to seat three Democrats claiming fraud, Republicans keep control regardless of results.”
I 100% agree, they will steal or try to steal the election using pseudo-legal maneuvers. We saw this stunt in the 2020 election in NC for a state SC seat. The democrats won and republicans sued to thrown out 60,000 votes. The scheme failed and after six months the democrat was seated. However, the democrats lost six months fighting an expensive legal challenge ($1.5 million).
In 2026, republicans could easily challenge five or six seats (how many seats they lose by) and hold up the House being passed to democrats for almost a year, based on dubious legal challenges.
Bottom line: They’ve done this in the past, and now with all the levers of power under their control, nothing can stop them. The precedent has been set, and based on past history, it’s unambiguous that they will do the same thing for 2026. IMHO…:)