Eighteen states have handed their complete voter files to the Trump Justice Department, the drivers license and Social Security numbers of every registered voter included. Between them, those eighteen states hold 148 US House seats, 36 Senate seats, and 184 electoral votes, roughly two thirds of what it takes to run the House, the Senate, and the White House.
The administration does not need every state to comply for an effective election theft apparatus and they’re pushing on a dozen fronts at once. Only a few need to be successful for the federal election apparatus to be compromised.
A March 2025 executive order ordered states to change how they run elections and threatened to withhold federal money from the ones that refused to comply. The Justice Department went straight for the data, asking all 50 states and the District of Columbia to hand over their voter files. The Department of Homeland Security rebuilt a dormant database called SAVE so states could run those files through it for citizenship checks.
A second order, in March 2026, told the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on a federally approved list. Financial pressure was also applied via grant conditions that make states rewrite their election rules and run their rolls through SAVE or lose 20 percent of their homeland security funding, a program worth more than a billion dollars. DHS made those conditions official in July, and two dozen states sued within two weeks.
Most states said no, and so far they are winning in courts. The Federal government has filed 31 lawsuits against 30 states and the District of Columbia, and not one court, trial or appeal, has ruled in their favor. In June a federal judge, Sparkle Sooknanan, struck down the rebuilt SAVE system as a violation of three federal laws and wrote that the government had “knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens.” Days later a judge in Boston, Indira Talwani, blocked the heart of the mail voting order, ruling flatly that “The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections.” Those wins are not invalid, but they are also not sufficient to protect federal elections.
So why is it not enough to have 30 states protect their voter rolls and data? Because once a state hands over its file, the government keeps it, and the system has been effective the moment one state complies, no matter how many others hold out. Twelve states had turned over complete files by early April. Texas alone ran its 18 million registered voters through SAVE. A court order months later cannot un-transfer a file, and the department’s own Office of Legal Counsel has already written that the Attorney General can compel the files and share them with Homeland Security regardless of what any single state wants.
Alongside the data, the department asked states to sign a confidential agreement to purge any voter it flagged, within 45 days. Two agreed, Alaska and Texas. A state that signs has given the federal executive branch ongoing control over who stays on its voter roll, with no checks or apolitical watchdogs involved.
Control of Congress runs through a handful of competitive states, and several of them already cooperated: Texas, Ohio, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina. At least 25 states have already run their rolls through SAVE, 60 million registrations in a single year, with another 7.4 million from North Carolina, where Republicans run the election board. The states that matter most to the outcome are the ones that opened the door.
The data rulings protect mostly the states that sued. The mail voting rulings reach further: Talwani has now blocked that order nationwide, and a separate case brought by the NAACP protects ballot delivery everywhere, with the fight now at the Supreme Court. But delivery is the whole of what those wins protect. None of them claws back a file already sent, and none of them touches the purge agreements or the state purge laws. A voter in Houston or Columbus is safe on delivery and exposed on everything else, because that state already gave up its file and joined the purge.
The purge is where the data does its work. In one year the system checked 60 million registrations and flagged roughly 24,000 as possible noncitizens and several hundred thousand more as possibly dead, and it can flag as many as it likes. The burden then runs backward: nobody has to prove a flagged voter is ineligible before the registration is canceled, the voter has to prove they are eligible. In Texas, flagged voters got a letter and 30 days to answer, and some who did turned out to be citizens. It works a second way too, by scaring people off registering at all, since anyone the system flags can be handed to Homeland Security for criminal investigation. In a race decided by a few thousand votes, thinning one side quietly is sufficient to decide elections, even while the national totals barely move.
And the litigation is built so that even losing pays. After losing the data cases in California, Michigan, and Oregon, the department raced to the appeals courts arguing that without a fast ruling the integrity of those states’ elections would be in doubt, telling the judges there is “no other process to ensure a fair election in 2026.” Look at what that does. Months before a vote is cast, the government has entered into the official record a reason to treat the results in the refusing states as suspect. Cooperate, and it takes your data and runs your purge. Refuse, and it hands itself a written pretext to challenge your count.
None of this stops at the voter rolls. The FBI has seized Fulton County’s 2020 ballots and demanded the names of everyone who worked that election, and a March order tells the Justice Department to prioritize prosecuting election officials it decides handed ballots to the wrong people. Collecting workers’ names and dangling prosecution empties the field of people willing to run elections at all, indictment or no indictment. In Congress, Trump is leaning on the Senate to pass the SAVE America Act, which would require citizenship papers to register, gut mail voting, and force every state to submit its rolls to Homeland Security. He has said plainly what it is for: it will “guarantee the midterms.”
So here is the actual scoreboard. In a single stretch of June the wins stacked up: courts threw out the SAVE system, blocked the mail voting order, and upheld a state’s ballot deadline at the Supreme Court. Now set beside them what is still in effect. Every file already handed over is still handed over. Every purge agreement signed is still in force, and every registration canceled under it is still canceled. The court filings branding the refusing states’ results suspect are still on file. The grant conditions are still live.
So how many states does it take? Stealing an election needs three things: enough voter data, cooperation from the states holding the competitive races, and an official reason to dispute the results anywhere the ruling party chooses. Texas delivered the first two by itself, 18 million records and a signature on the removal agreement, its own voters purged and its own competitive seats in play. The Justice Department’s court filings delivered the third.
Vote, please. But recognize that this alone is insufficient to take back our country.
Want to do something about it? Well it’s our job at the Existentialist Republic to address exactly the issue this article outlines and then hand people tools to make change because when the federal government and a large fraction of states have abandoned fairness, freedom, and democracy, we need a plan.
But just so you know, it’s 10 people like yourself, 10 activists per article who subscribe by clicking the button below, that fund all of this. All 3 free books, all 12 booklets, the 4 pieces of model legislation, and the 20-40 articles per month.
Don’t let this be the reason you miss a meal or are late on rent.
But if this helps you and you can become a subscriber, you’re one of the 10 that makes it all possible.
The Existentialist Republic Library
You can get a free PDF of the book in the BMAC shop for $0.00 by clicking on this sentence.
More reading
Conservatism: America’s Personality Disorder — physical copy / free download
Intro to Soft Secession — physical copy / free download
Oppositional Federalism and You — physical copy / free download
Toppling Tyrants: A Field Guide to Dismantling American Fascism — physical copy / free download
Grab Them By The E.A.R.R.: How to Get Politicians to Do What You Want — physical copy / free download
More Free Downloads:
Soft Secession: 100 Policies That Pass
Being Dangerous: Go From Activist to Operative
All Four Completed Model Legislation Bills
The Opposition Guide to Tax Warfare
Six-Panel Soft Secession Brochure




Bullet Points For Activists:
• Check your voter registration now—and check it again before Election Day.
• Help others check theirs, especially friends, family, and neighbors who may have moved or changed addresses.
• Watch for voter purges. If someone is removed from the rolls, help them find out why and get reinstated if they’re eligible.
• Document problems. Keep notices, dates, screenshots, and communications with election officials.
• Support local election workers. They are the people who protect the actual process on the ground.
• Pay attention to court rulings and changes to voting rules in your state—especially regarding registration, mail ballots, and voter-roll maintenance.
• Don’t spread unverified claims. Election integrity depends on facts, documentation, transparency, and scrutiny.
• And yes: VOTE. But don’t stop there. Help make sure everyone who is legally entitled to vote can actually cast a ballot—and that every legitimate ballot is counted.
This should infuriate every American. If it doesn't then you're the problem.